Differentiation of Mixing Rules

Since a compositional derivative is necessary to obtain the partial molar quantities, and the compositions are present in summation terms, we must understand the procedures for differentiation of the sums. Since all of the compositional dependence is embedded in these terms, if we understand how these terms are handled, we can then apply the results to any equation of state. Only three types of sums appear in most forms of equations of state, which have been introduced above. The first type of derivative we will encounter is of the form

Image Since the compositional dependence is within the mixing rule, if we understand how to differentiate the general mixing rules, then we can easily apply them to the models that use them.

Image

where Image. For a binary nb = n1b1 + n2b2, and k will be encountered once in the sum, whether k = 1 or k = 2, thus:

Image

and the general result is

Image

The second type of derivative which we will encounter is of the form

Image

n2a may be written as Image. For a binary mixture, Image. Taking the appropriate derivative,

Image

The general result is

Image

For the virial equation, we need to differentiate a function that will look like:

Image

Differentiation by the product rule gives

Image

The double sum in the derivative is n2B which we have evaluated in equivalent form in Eqn. 15.25. The second term is just B given by Eqn. 15.1. Therefore, we have for a binary mixture

Image

The general result is

Image


Example 15.3. Fugacity coefficient from the virial equation

For moderate deviations from the ideal-gas law, a common method is to use the virial equation given by:

Z = 1 + BP/RT

where Image. Develop an expression for the fugacity coefficient.

Solution

For the virial equation, we have the result of Eqn. 9.30Image

Applying Eqn. 15.12

Image

the argument we need to differentiate looks like Image.

Differentiation has been performed in Eqn. 15.29, which we can generalize as

Image

which has been shown earlier for a binary in Eqn. 15.14.



Example 15.4. Fugacity coefficient from the van der Waals equation

Van der Waals’ equation of state provides a simple but fairly accurate representation of key equation of state concepts for mixtures. The main manipulations developed for this equation are the same for other equations of state but the algebra is a little simpler. Recalling van der Waals’ equation from Chapter 6,

Image

where Image and Image. Develop an expression for the fugacity coefficient.

Solution

We need to apply Eqn. 15.17. For the departure, we apply Eqn. 8.27 because the differentiation indicated above is performed at constant volume, not constant pressure.

Image

Apply Eqn. 15.17, but instead of differentiating directly, use the chain rule, Eqn. 6.16.

Image
Image

Image



Example 15.5. Fugacity coefficient from the Peng-Robinson equation

The Peng-Robinson equation is given by

Image

where Image and Image. Develop an expression for the fugacity coefficient.

Solution

We need to apply Eqn. 15.17. From integration for the pure fluid,

Image

The next steps look intimidating. Basically, they apply the same procedure for differentiation as the last example.

Image

Note a simplification that is not obvious:

Image

Substituting the following definitions,

Image
Image


Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *