Supplement 3: Standard States

An important principle of the following discussion is that the chemical potential should be a property of the state of the system. All models should result in an identical value for the chemical potential at the same state. The standard state provides a convenient reference condition, but is slightly different from a reference state because it is at the same temperature as the system.37

The typical convention for nonelectrolytes uses mole fractions and the Lewis-Randall standard state Image:

Image

An alternative convention is related to the Henry’s law standard state Image and the activity coefficient is known as the rational activity coefficient.38

Image

The activity coefficients on the two scales are related.

Image

Inserting the activity coefficient relation into Eqn. 18.158 results in

Image

Consider Eqn. 18.158. Inserting Eqn. 18.147 to replace the mole fraction,

Image

Because molality is not dimensionless, but activity is dimensionless, we must introduce some manipulations. We wish to introduce a molal activity coefficient, Image, to use with molal concentrations. The convention is to set the standard state as a hypothetical ideal solution, Image, at unit molality, mo = 1 mol/(kg solvent). Introducing the standard state concentration (twice):

Image

The unit value of mo is traditionally omitted and thus “transparent.” We define the molal activity coefficient:

Image

Note that Eqn. 18.147 can be reinserted into Eqn. 18.163 to eliminate xs, if desired. Inserting Eqn. 18.163 into Eqn. 18.162,

Image

We can see that the standard state reference potential must be given by the first two terms on the right-hand side of the equation:

Image

Substituting Eqn. 18.165 into Eqn. 18.164 results in the molal standard state and molal activity coefficient:

Image

The activities corresponding to the standard states are thus

Image

Image

Image

where the activities from the different scales are not equal at a given concentration because of the difference in standard states. Combining Eqns. 18.162 and 18.147,

Image

Finally, we note that the value of mo is dropped from all the final expressions in application, based on the assertion that its value is 1 molal by the definition of the standard state. This is the basis for the equations presented in Sections 18.4 and 18.13.


Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *